9 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Circuits for integrating learned and innate valences in the insect brain.
Funder: Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAnimal behavior is shaped both by evolution and by individual experience. Parallel brain pathways encode innate and learned valences of cues, but the way in which they are integrated during action-selection is not well understood. We used electron microscopy to comprehensively map with synaptic resolution all neurons downstream of all mushroom body (MB) output neurons (encoding learned valences) and characterized their patterns of interaction with lateral horn (LH) neurons (encoding innate valences) in Drosophila larva. The connectome revealed multiple convergence neuron types that receive convergent MB and LH inputs. A subset of these receives excitatory input from positive-valence MB and LH pathways and inhibitory input from negative-valence MB pathways. We confirmed functional connectivity from LH and MB pathways and behavioral roles of two of these neurons. These neurons encode integrated odor value and bidirectionally regulate turning. Based on this, we speculate that learning could potentially skew the balance of excitation and inhibition onto these neurons and thereby modulate turning. Together, our study provides insights into the circuits that integrate learned and innate valences to modify behavior
Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Neonates Enables Precision Medicine Pipeline
Rapid genome sequencing in critically ill infants is increasingly identified as a crucial test for providing targeted and informed patient care. We report the outcomes of a pilot study wherein eight critically ill neonates received rapid whole genome sequencing with parental samples in an effort to establish a prompt diagnosis. Our pilot study resulted in a 37.5% diagnostic rate by whole genome sequencing alone and an overall 50% diagnostic rate for the cohort. We describe how the diagnoses led to identification of additional affected relatives and a change in management, the limitations of rapid genome sequencing, and some of the challenges with sample collection. Alongside this pilot study, our site simultaneously established a research protocol pipeline that will allow us to conduct research-based genomic testing in the cases for which a diagnosis was not reached by rapid genome sequencing or other available clinical testing. Here we describe the benefits, limitations, challenges, and potential for rapid whole genome sequencing to be incorporated into routine clinical evaluation in the neonatal period
A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of complete insect nervous systems across multiple life stages.
Molecular profiles of neurons influence neural development and function but bridging the gap between genes, circuits, and behavior has been very difficult. Here we used single cell RNAseq to generate a complete gene expression atlas of the Drosophila larval central nervous system composed of 131,077 single cells across three developmental stages (1 h, 24 h and 48 h after hatching). We identify 67 distinct cell clusters based on the patterns of gene expression. These include 31 functional mature larval neuron clusters, 1 ring gland cluster, 8 glial clusters, 6 neural precursor clusters, and 13 developing immature adult neuron clusters. Some clusters are present across all stages of larval development, while others are stage specific (such as developing adult neurons). We identify genes that are differentially expressed in each cluster, as well as genes that are differentially expressed at distinct stages of larval life. These differentially expressed genes provide promising candidates for regulating the function of specific neuronal and glial types in the larval nervous system, or the specification and differentiation of adult neurons. The cell transcriptome Atlas of the Drosophila larval nervous system is a valuable resource for developmental biology and systems neuroscience and provides a basis for elucidating how genes regulate neural development and function
Recommended from our members
Adult MTM1-related myopathy carriers: Classification based on deep phenotyping.
ObjectiveTo better characterize adult myotubularin 1 (MTM1)-related myopathy carriers and recommend a phenotypic classification.MethodsThis cohort study was performed at the NIH Clinical Center. Participants were required to carry a confirmed MTM1 mutation and were recruited via the Congenital Muscle Disease International Registry (n = 8), a traveling local clinic of the Neuromuscular and Neurogenetic Disorders of Childhood Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH and Cure CMD (n = 1), and direct physician referral (n = 1). Neuromuscular examinations, muscle MRI, dynamic breathing MRI, cardiac MRI, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), physical therapy assessments including the Motor Function Measure 32 (MFM-32) scale, and X chromosome inactivation (XCI) studies were performed.ResultsPhenotypic categories were proposed based on ambulatory status and muscle weakness. Carriers were categorized as severe (nonambulatory; n = 1), moderate (minimal independent ambulation/assisted ambulation; n = 3), mild (independent ambulation but with evidence of muscle weakness; n = 4), and nonmanifesting (no evidence of muscle weakness; n = 2). Carriers with more severe muscle weakness exhibited greater degrees of respiratory insufficiency and abnormal signal on muscle imaging. Skeletal asymmetries were evident in both manifesting and nonmanifesting carriers. Skewed XCI did not explain phenotypic severity.ConclusionThis work illustrates the phenotypic range of MTM1-related myopathy carriers in adulthood and recommends a phenotypic classification. This classification, defined by ambulatory status and muscle weakness, is supported by muscle MRI, PFT, and MFM-32 scale composite score findings, which may serve as markers of disease progression and outcome measures in future gene therapy or other clinical trials
Hidden Concepts in the History of Origins-of-Life Studies
In this review, we describe some of the central philosophical issues facing origins-of-life
research and provide a targeted history of the developments that have led to the multidisciplinary
field of origins-of-life studies. We outline these issues and developments to guide
researchers and students from all fields. With respect to philosophy, we provide brief summaries
of debates with respect to (1) definitions (or theories) of life, what life is and how research
should be conducted in the absence of an accepted theory of life, (2) the distinctions between
synthetic, historical, and universal projects in origins-of-life studies, issues with strategies for
inferring the origins of life, such as (3) the nature of the first living entities (the “bottom up”
approach) and (4) how to infer the nature of the last universal common ancestor (the “top
down” approach), and (5) the status of origins of life as a science. Each of these debates
influences the others. Although there are clusters of researchers that agree on some answers to
these issues, each of these debates is still open. With respect to history, we outline several
independent paths that have led to some of the approaches now prevalent in origins-of-life
studies. These include one path from early views of life through the scientific revolutions
brought about by Linnaeus (von Linn.), Wöhler, Miller, and others. In this approach, new
theories, tools, and evidence guide new thoughts about the nature of life and its origin.We also
describe another family of paths motivated by a” circularity” approach to life, which is guided
by such thinkers as Maturana & Varela, Gánti, Rosen, and others. These views echo ideas
developed by Kant and Aristotle, though they do so using modern science in ways that
produce exciting avenues of investigation. By exploring the history of these ideas, we can
see how many of the issues that currently interest us have been guided by the contexts in which
the ideas were developed. The disciplinary backgrounds of each of these scholars has
influenced the questions they sought to answer, the experiments they envisioned, and the
kinds of data they collected. We conclude by encouraging scientists and scholars in the
humanities and social sciences to explore ways in which they can interact to provide a deeper
understanding of the conceptual assumptions, structure, and history of origins-of-life research.
This may be useful to help frame future research agendas and bring awareness to the
multifaceted issues facing this challenging scientific question
Hidden Concepts in the History and Philosophy of Origins-of-Life Studies: a Workshop Report
In this review, we describe some of the central philosophical issues facing origins-of-life research and provide a targeted history of the developments that have led to the multidisciplinary field of origins-of-life studies. We outline these issues and developments to guide researchers and students from all fields. With respect to philosophy, we provide brief summaries of debates with respect to (1) definitions (or theories) of life, what life is and how research should be conducted in the absence of an accepted theory of life, (2) the distinctions between synthetic, historical, and universal projects in origins-of-life studies, issues with strategies for inferring the origins of life, such as (3) the nature of the first living entities (the “bottom up” approach) and (4) how to infer the nature of the last universal common ancestor (the “top down” approach), and (5) the status of origins of life as a science. Each of these debates influences the others. Although there are clusters of researchers that agree on some answers to these issues, each of these debates is still open. With respect to history, we outline several independent paths that have led to some of the approaches now prevalent in origins-of-life studies. These include one path from early views of life through the scientific revolutions brought about by Linnaeus (von Linn.), Wöhler, Miller, and others. In this approach, new theories, tools, and evidence guide new thoughts about the nature of life and its origin. We also describe another family of paths motivated by a” circularity” approach to life, which is guided by such thinkers as Maturana & Varela, Gánti, Rosen, and others. These views echo ideas developed by Kant and Aristotle, though they do so using modern science in ways that produce exciting avenues of investigation. By exploring the history of these ideas, we can see how many of the issues that currently interest us have been guided by the contexts in which the ideas were developed. The disciplinary backgrounds of each of these scholars has influenced the questions they sought to answer, the experiments they envisioned, and the kinds of data they collected. We conclude by encouraging scientists and scholars in the humanities and social sciences to explore ways in which they can interact to provide a deeper understanding of the conceptual assumptions, structure, and history of origins-of-life research. This may be useful to help frame future research agendas and bring awareness to the multifaceted issues facing this challenging scientific question